Legal update – Voodooism Recognised as a Protected Belief


Voodooism Recognised as a Protected Belief: What Employers Need to Know 

A recent employment tribunal ruling has affirmed that voodooism qualifies as a protected religious belief under the Equality Act 2010. This decision, stemming from a case involving a Walsall council worker’s claims of harassment based on race, religion, and belief, provides critical insights for employers navigating workplace diversity and inclusion. 

 

Case Overview 

The claimant, Mr. Wint, alleged he was harassed when a colleague, Mandy Shone, made a remark referencing a voodoo doll. While Wint believed the comment was directed at him as a Black person of Jamaican heritage, the tribunal found that Shone had intended to express exhaustion rather than target Wint personally. The panel ultimately dismissed the claim but made a significant determination: voodooism constitutes a “spiritual belief system” protected under the Equality Act. 

However, the tribunal distinguished between voodooism as a religious belief and the use of voodoo dolls, which it deemed a separate concept not protected under the Act. 

 

Key Takeaways for Employers 

Employers must recognise that the definition of religious and philosophical beliefs under the Equality Act 2010 is broad. The ruling highlights that even lesser-known belief systems can receive legal protection if they meet the established criteria. To ensure compliance, employers should regularly review and update workplace policies to acknowledge a diverse range of religious beliefs. HR teams and managers should be trained to recognise and accommodate different beliefs, ensuring employees feel respected and supported in their faith practices. Clear guidance should also be provided on how employees can report concerns about religious discrimination or insensitivity. 

The tribunal acknowledged that the comment about a voodoo doll was not intended as harassment. However, it also noted that voodoo is a sensitive topic, making such remarks inappropriate in a professional setting. Employers should implement workplace training on cultural awareness, unconscious bias, and respectful communication. Encouraging employees to be mindful of their words and how they might impact others can help prevent misunderstandings. Establishing a zero-tolerance policy for inappropriate jokes or comments about religious or cultural beliefs will reinforce the importance of maintaining a respectful work environment. 

A significant flaw in the employer’s handling of the grievance was the failure to clearly inform Wint of his right to escalate his complaint. This contributed to his prolonged absence and dissatisfaction with the process. Employers should ensure grievance policies are clear, well-documented, and easily accessible to all employees. Effective communication about grievance procedures, including steps for escalation, is essential. Managers should be trained to handle complaints with empathy, impartiality, and in a timely manner. Following up with employees after a grievance has been resolved can also help ensure continued support and job satisfaction. 

The tribunal’s ruling emphasised that not every comment related to race or religion constitutes harassment. Employers must strike a balance between addressing concerns sensitively and ensuring that legitimate workplace discussions are not unduly restricted. Managers should receive training on handling sensitive complaints in a way that is both fair and legally sound. Encouraging open discussions on diversity and inclusion while setting clear guidelines on respectful dialogue can foster a more inclusive workplace culture. Employees should feel comfortable expressing concerns without fear of retaliation, and a culture of mutual respect should be actively promoted. 

 

Conclusion 

This case serves as a crucial reminder that workplace diversity and inclusion extend beyond widely recognised religions. Employers must remain aware of the evolving legal landscape, foster a respectful work environment, and ensure robust grievance procedures. By taking proactive steps to educate employees, implement inclusive policies, and address grievances effectively, employers can create a more inclusive, legally compliant, and respectful workplace for all employees.